HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1001512 of 2006 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J. 1. List has been revised. None for the petitioner. Sri Divesh Mishra, learned Standing Counsel is present. 2. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, is vacated. November 11, 2025 Gautam Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Shukla, Arun Kr. Shukla, Tribhuvan Narain Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Yogendra Nath Yadav (Irshad Ali,J.) Girija Dayal U.P.Z.A. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Revenue And 2 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench