UMESH v. STATE OF U.P.THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/11605/2024 · 2025-10-29
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182811 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182811 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11605 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present application has become infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 29, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajmal Khan, Rajesh Kumar, Smriti Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Umesh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P.Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench