Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182802 (ALL)

SUMER CHANDRA ALIAS SUMER CHANDRA RAWAT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/10076/2025 · 2025-11-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10076 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Sri Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocate has filed power on behalf of the respondent no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Anand Mani Tripathi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Bhupendra Prakash, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ajay Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. This application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the impugned Charge sheet no. 01/2023 dated 21.10.2023 as submitted against the applicant in F.I.R. No. 0303/2023, u/s 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C., Police Station- P.G.I., District- Lucknow, the impugned summoning/cognizance order dated 09.04.2024 passed in criminal case no. 37188 Of 2024, "State Of Uttar Pradesh Versus Sumer Chandra", u/s 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- P.G.I., Lucknow and the entire proceedings of the Case No. 37188 of 2024." 4. The parties are present today and they have no objection with regard to quashing of the proceedings. 5. Learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for the private respondent jointly submit that the compromise dated 26.11.2025 has been executed between the parties and the parties are agree for quashing of the proceedings. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anurag Tripathi, Bhupendra Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sumer Chandra Alias Sumer Chandra Rawat .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Learned A.G.A. has no objection with regard to the quashing of the proceedings. 7. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record as well as the supplementary affidavit, it is evident that the parties have entered into compromise by way of compromise deed dated 26.11.2025 and the issue has been resolved between the parties. 8. With above observations, this application is allowed. The impugned charge-sheet no. 01/2023 dated 21.10.2023 as submitted against the applicant in F.I.R. No. 0303/2023, u/s 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C., Police Station- P.G.I., District- Lucknow, the impugned summoning/cognizance order dated 09.04.2024 passed in criminal case no. 37188 of 2024, "State of Uttar Pradesh Versus Sumer Chandra", u/s 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- P.G.I., Lucknow, and the entire proceedings in pursuance thereof are hereby quashed. 9. Office is directed to communicate this order to the trial Court, forthwith. November 26, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 10076 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench