HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9163 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- “The petitioners named above most respectfully begs to submit that for the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the Charge-Sheet No. 68/2016, dated 31.01.2016, under sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya, as well as Summoning Order Dated 12.05.2016 passed by Learned Additional Sessions Judge /F.T.C.-1st, Ayodhya, in Session Trial No. 171/2021, 'State Vs Pooja Singh', arising out of Case Crime No. 213/2015, under sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., at Police Station -Kotwali Nagar, District - Ayodhya, so far it relates with the present petitioners, in the light of compromise dated 26.03.2025. It is further prayed that the further proceedings in the above mentioned Session Trial No. 171/2021, 'State Vs Pooja Singh', pending before the Learned Additional Sessions Judge / F.T.C.-1st, Ayodhya, may kindly be stayed, during pendency of this petition, so far it relates with the present petitioners. Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners in the interest of justice.” 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brijesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pooja Singh And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No. 4 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same on record. October 31, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 9163 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench