VIKRAM RATHAUR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/1582/2024 · 2025-10-29
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182797 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182797 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1582 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. No one appears on behalf of the informant despite service of notice.
2. The present application has been filed under Section 438 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No. 145 of 2024, under Sections 34, 304, 504, 506 & 323 I.P.C., PS Beniganj, District Hardoi.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the applicant was enlarged on anticipatory bail on 18.7.2025 thereafter chargesheet have been filed. The co accused have been enlarged on regular bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail prayer.
5. Considering and adopting the reasoning while granting interim bail the applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed till the conclusion of trial.
6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Vikram Rathaur be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till conclusion of the trial on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Alok Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vikram Rathaur .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. October 29, 2025 J. K. Dinkar ABAIL No. 1582 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench