Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182793 (ALL)

AMIT MAURYA @ RAJA MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/11669/2025 · 2025-12-03

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11669 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Counter affidavit filed today on behalf of complainant is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Rajat Raj Narayan Bajpai, learned counsel for the complainant and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 627 of 2025, under sections 65(1), 351(2) BNS, Section 5I/6 POCSO Act, Sections 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act, P.S. Para, District Lucknow. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of informant aged about 16 years met with applicant and on false pretext of marriage physical relations were formed, some videos were also made and threats were being issued. It was stated that physical relation was formed over a span of one and half years. In the statement under Section 183 BNSS the victim admitted that they met through Instagram 4 years ago and physical relations were formed with the consent on alleged false pretext of marriage. The tentative age of the victim is around 16 years. There is no definite document with regard to exact age of the victim. 5. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shyam Bahadur Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amit Maurya @ Raja Maurya .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Considering the statement of the victim that the relationship were formed with her consent, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 31.8.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Amit Maurya @ Raja Maurya be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 3, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11669 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench