Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18278 (CHH)

SUBHASH GUPTA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPCR/219/2025 · 2025-04-21

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:17805-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 219 of 2025 Subhash Gupta S/o Ramavtar Aged About 55 Years R/o Ward No.-01, Near Om Darshana Petrol Pump, Ambikapur Road, Bagicha, District - Jashpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Collector Cum District Magistrate, Jashpur, District - Jashpur (C.G.) 2 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate Bagicha, District - Jashpur (C.G.) 3 - Nagar Panchayat Bagicha Through Chief Municipal OfÏcer, Nagar Panchayat Bagicha, Bagicha District - Jashpur (C.G.) 4 - Station House OfÏcer Police Station- Bagicha District - Jashpur (C.G.) 5 - Shri Ram Steel Fabrication Work And Trunk Industries Firm Through Its Proprietor Hitendra Gupta S/o Shri Ram Gupta, At Ward No.-01, Near Om Darshana Petrol Pump, Ambikapur Road, Bagicha District - Jashpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arham Siddiqui, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S.Baghel, Panel Lawyer. 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 21/04/2025 1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken through video conferencing. 2. Heard Mr. Arham Siddiqui, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. S.S.Baghel, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents No. 1, 2 and 4. 3. The petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No. 2/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Bagicha, District Jashpur to conclude the proceedings under Section 133 of Cr.P.C (Section 152 of BNSS) pending before him as Revenue Case No. 202403031300007, year 2023-2024 (Annexure P/1) strictly in accordance with law and the documents available on record, within a short stipulated time as directed by this Hon’ble Court to safeguard the fundamental rights of the petitioner, in the interest of justice. 10.2 Any appropriate writ, direction or order may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case.” 4. At the outset, Mr. Siddiqui, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition 3 with liberty to take recourse to law before the appropriate forum. 5. Learned counsel for the other side has no objection. 6. In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 7. Certified copy of the documents annexed with the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after retaining a photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Amit AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2025.04.24 13:21:38 +0530