Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182779 (ALL)

SEETA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. OF HOME DEPTT. AND ANOTHER

/714/2025 · 2025-11-19

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 714 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.123 of 2025, under Sections 85, 80(2) BNS, Sections 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Safipur, District Unnao. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of informant was married to brother of applicant around 4 years ago and subsequently entire matrimonial family had killed her for dowry. Cause of death as per post mortem report is ante mortem hanging and apart from ligature mark no other injury was observed. The applicant is sister in law (nanad) of the deceased. 4. Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the post mortem report and there being nothing specific against the applicant, prima facie, a case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. 6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Seeta be released on anticipatory Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prabhat Kumar Mishra, Abdul Ahad, Jatin Raheja, Shobhit Harsh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Dheeraj Awasthi Seeta .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Of Home Deptt. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) bail in the abovesaid first information report number till submission of the charge-sheet on her furnishing personal bonds of Rs 5000 to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. November 19, 2025 J. K. Dinkar NABAIL No. 714 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench