Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182776 (MAD)

Karuppu @ Lakshmanakanthan v. The State Rep by Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/21267/2025 · 2025-09-10

T V Thamilselvi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 21267 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL OP No. 21267 of 2025 Karuppu @ Lakshmanakanthan Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by Inspector of Police, Adhiyamankottai Police Station, Dharmapuri (Crime No 67 of 2025) Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in the event of arrest in Crime No. 67 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Edin Ashwald K For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21267 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 331(3), 305(a) of BNS 2023, in Crime No.67 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of prosecution is that the petitioner had stolen 100 sovereigns of gold jewels and silver anklet worth about Rs.10,00,000/- from the defacto complainant's house. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Adovacate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner had stolen 100 sovereigns of gold jewels and silver anklet worth about Rs.10,00,000/- from the defacto https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21267 of 2025 complainant's house and 22 sovereigns of gold jewels only recovered. He would also submit that if he is released on bail, he will tamper the witnesses and hamper the investigation. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6.On considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by both counsel and also on considering the gravity of offence committed by the petitioner, and the fact that only 22 sovereigns of gold jewels only recovered from the petitioner and investigation is at the initial stage and also the fact that there is possibility of tampering the witnesses and hampering the investigation, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21267 of 2025 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 10-09-2025 gbi Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21267 of 2025 To 1.The State Rep by Inspector of Police, Adhiyamankottai Police Station, Dharmapuri (Crime No 67 of 2025) 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21267 of 2025 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. gbi CRL OP No. 21267 of 2025 10-09-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis