ANURUDDH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/10550/2025 · 2025-10-30
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182752 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182752 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10550 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.11 of 2025, under Sections 80(2), 85 of BNS and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station G.R.P., District Raebareli.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that on similar allegations, father-in-law has been granted bail vide order dated 16.10.2025 in Criminal Misc. Case No. 6435 of 2025. The applicant herein is brother-in- law and noting specific has been attributed against her. He is in custody since 20.05.2025 and has no criminal history.
4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail, but he could not dispute the facts stated above.
5. Considering the facts stated by learned counsel for the applicant and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 20.05.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Anuruddh be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd.Altaf Mansoor, Aditya Vikram Singh, Yogesh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anuruddh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
October 30, 2025 A.Nigam BAIL No. 10550 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench