HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6419 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent no.1. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to respondent nos. 2 and 3, is dispensed with. 3. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to direct the respondent no.1 i.e. Naib Tehsildar, Milkipur, Tehsil- Milkipur, District Ayodhya to decide the Case No. 2482/2025, Computerized Case No. T-202504230402482, namely, "Vipin Kumar Pandey Vs. Jaichandra Singh, under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, Expeditiously within a stipulated period, as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice. 4. It has been submitted that petitioner applied for mutation under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, which is listed before opposite party no.1 on 07.02.2025. In the aforesaid mutation application, the opposite party no.3 without any locus, moved an application for grant of time for filing detail objection on 12.05.2025, but till date no detail objection has been filed. It has been stated that the matter is urgent and a perusal of the order sheet clearly indicates that though the case is regularly listed but it is routinely adjourned on one pretext or the other. 5. It is noticed that the instant matter relates to 2025 and the trial courts Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Vipin Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) Naib Tehsildar Milkipur, Tehsil-Milkipur, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) are heavily burdened with the dockets due to which large number of cases are pending before them. In the present case, no extraordinary circumstance has been indicated by the petitioner so as to interfere and pass orders for expeditious disposal of the mutation application, which has been filed only in 2025. Accordingly, no case for interference is made out at this stage. 6. However, looking to the aforesaid circumstances, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate application before the trial court within next two weeks for expediting the proceedings. In case, such an application is made, the trail court shall consider and decide the same within two weeks thereafter by a reasoned and speaking order. In case, the trial court finds that a case for urgency has been made out, it shall proceed to consider and decide the mutation proceeding of the petitioner expeditiously. 7. With aforesaid direction the petition stands disposed of. November 4, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6419 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench