CWP-2772-2020 239 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Baba Zorawar Singh Fateh Singh Khalsa Girls College, Morinda State of Punjab and CORAM : HON'BLE Present: Mr. Mr. Rahul Rampal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. HARSIMRAN SINGH 1. In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the petitioners is that the petitioner under the Post Matric Scholarship Scheme, by the respondents. 2. Learned c raised in the present petition has already been answered by this Court in No.13761 of 2024 titled “Akashdeep and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.” and other connected cases, disposed of in terms of the said order. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits case, the present petition is disposed of in terms of “Akashdeep and ors. V decided on 09.01.2025. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent 2020 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- CWP Date of Decision : Baba Zorawar Singh Fateh Singh Khalsa Girls College, Morinda VERSUS and Others CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Ankush Singla, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Rahul Rampal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. -.- HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the petitioners is that the petitioner-institution is not being given its entitled payment of the dues under the Post Matric Scholarship Scheme, by the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner raised in the present petition has already been answered by this Court in No.13761 of 2024 titled “Akashdeep and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.” and other connected cases, decided on 09.01.2025 hence, the present petition be also disposed of in terms of the said order. Learned counsel for the respondent submits case, the present petition is disposed of in terms of “Akashdeep and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.” and other connected cases, decided on 09.01.2025. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-2772-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision : 29.07.2025 ....Petitioner ....Respondents HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Rampal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the petitioners is institution is not being given its entitled payment of the dues under the Post Matric Scholarship Scheme, by the respondents. ounsel for the petitioner-institution submits that the issue raised in the present petition has already been answered by this Court in CWP No.13761 of 2024 titled “Akashdeep and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.” and .2025 hence, the present petition be also Learned counsel for the respondent submits he has no objection in case, the present petition is disposed of in terms of CWP No.13761 of 2024 titled s. State of Punjab and ors.” and other connected cases, Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent further submits In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the petitioners is institution is not being given its entitled payment of the dues institution submits that the issue CWP No.13761 of 2024 titled “Akashdeep and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.” and .2025 hence, the present petition be also no objection in CWP No.13761 of 2024 titled s. State of Punjab and ors.” and other connected cases, submits TRIPTI SAINI 2025.08.02 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-2772-2020 that though, the claim raised in the present petition has already been decided by this court while passing order in filed against the said order passed in 2025 and 1650- been issued but concedes the factum that judgment in has not been stayed. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the case file with their able assistance. 6. Once, the issue raised in the present petition has already been decided by this Court while passing order in have been filed mean that the claim of the petitioner raised in Akashdeep's case (supra), as to avoid discriminatio Akashdeep's case (supra) 7. Keeping in view facts and circumstances of the present case, the present petition is disposed of in the same terms and conditions as stipulated in Akashdeep's case (supra). 8. It may be noticed that in the present case, time period of eight weeks’ as granted in Akashdeep's case (supra) of this order. 9. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. July 29, 2025 tripti Whether speaking/non Whether reportable 2020 (O&M) that though, the claim raised in the present petition has already been decided by this court while passing order in Akashdeep's case (supra), against the said order passed in Akashdeep's case (supra) -2025, wherein, notice as well as notice regarding stay has already been issued but concedes the factum that judgment in has not been stayed. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the th their able assistance. Once, the issue raised in the present petition has already been decided by this Court while passing order in Akashdeep's case (supra), have been filed against the order passed in Akashdeep's case (supra) mean that the claim of the petitioner-Institution, which is Akashdeep's case (supra), should not be disposed of in the same terms so as to avoid discrimination especially when, the operation of the judgment passed i Akashdeep's case (supra) has not been stayed. Keeping in view facts and circumstances of the present case, the present petition is disposed of in the same terms and conditions as stipulated in Akashdeep's case (supra). It may be noticed that in the present case, time period of eight weeks’ Akashdeep's case (supra) will start from the date of receipt of copy Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : No -2- that though, the claim raised in the present petition has already been decided by Akashdeep's case (supra), but appeals have been Akashdeep's case (supra) being LPA-1648 , wherein, notice as well as notice regarding stay has already been issued but concedes the factum that judgment in Akashdeep’s case (supra) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the Once, the issue raised in the present petition has already been decided Akashdeep's case (supra), merely that appeals Akashdeep's case (supra), does not Institution, which is akin to one which was should not be disposed of in the same terms so n especially when, the operation of the judgment passed i Keeping in view facts and circumstances of the present case, the present petition is disposed of in the same terms and conditions as stipulated in It may be noticed that in the present case, time period of eight weeks’ will start from the date of receipt of copy Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE speaking : Speaking No that though, the claim raised in the present petition has already been decided by s have been 1648- , wherein, notice as well as notice regarding stay has already Akashdeep’s case (supra) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the Once, the issue raised in the present petition has already been decided appeals does not to one which was should not be disposed of in the same terms so n especially when, the operation of the judgment passed in Keeping in view facts and circumstances of the present case, the present petition is disposed of in the same terms and conditions as stipulated in It may be noticed that in the present case, time period of eight weeks’ will start from the date of receipt of copy TRIPTI SAINI 2025.08.02 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document