AJAY NISHAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/6015/2025 · 2025-11-17
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182739 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182739 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6015 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 63 of 2025, under sections 65(1), 351(3) BNS and Sections 5j(ii)/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Nawabganj, District Gonda. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant aged about 15 years was enticed by the applicant around 7 months ago and physical relations were formed and subsequently she was carrying fetus of seven months. In the statement given by the victim under Section 180 BNSS she stated that around 7 months ago physical relations were formed in between them. In the statement under Section 183 BNSS the victim admitted that they were in love with each other and the applicant was not ready to get married. It is informed that a girl child has been born to the victim. There is no definite document with regard to exact age of the victim on record. Learned counsel for the applicant states that applicant is ready and willing to marry the victim. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neeraj Pandey, Pradeep Kumar Shukla, Shashwat Pratap Singh, Vinay Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ajay Nishad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Considering the said fact and the statements under Section 180 and 183 BNSS and there is nothing to form a view regarding the exact age of the victim, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 6.3.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7.
Let the applicant Ajay Nishad be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 17, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 6015 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench