Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182723 (ALL)

SMT. ASTHA SINGH THRU. HER HUSBAND SURAJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

HABC/394/2025 · 2025-11-06

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 394 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. The detenue in terms of the order dated 31.10.2025 has been brought before this Court by Sri Anand Pratap Singh, Sub-Inspector and Ms. Sonam, Constable, P.S. Khandasa District Ayodhya. 2. The detenue has also been identified by Sri Chandan Tiwari, Advocate, who has filed vakalatnama along with Sri Shivam Singh, Advocate, Sri Ashutosh Shukla, Advocate and Sri Atul Kumar Pathak, Advocate and the same is taken on record. 3. The detenue present before this Court has stated that she is living with her parents on her own volition and she does not want to live with her husband, namely Suraj through whom the present petition has been filed who has been identified by Sri Girish Kumar Pandey. 4. In view of the aforesaid statement of the detenue, the present petition is liable to be dismissed with cost. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed with cost of Rs. 10,000/- which shall be provided to the detenue, Smt. Astha Singh if deposited within 15 days from today. In case of failure the same shall be recovered as arrears of land revenue and thereafter, the same shall be provided to the detenue. November 6, 2025 Anurag Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girish Kumar Pandey, Chandra Chood Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Smt. Astha Singh Thru. Her Husband Suraj .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench