Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182712 (ALL)

RAHUL MAHTO @ RAHUL AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/2029/2025 · 2025-12-04

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2029 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. Heard. It has been submitted by learned Counsel for the applicants that all the aggrieved accused have not been made parties, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the instant application with liberty to file the same afresh.. The prayer sought has not been opposed by learned A.G.A.. In view of the above, the instant application is rejected as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. The certified copy of the impugned order or any other certified document filed along with the application shall be returned to the learned Counsel for the applicants by retaining a photocopy of the same on record. December 4, 2025 Mohit Singh/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vikas Misra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Rahul Mahto @ Rahul And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench