Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1827 (ALL)

RAJENDRA KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A227/11860/2025 · 2026-03-17

Harvir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11860 of 2025 Court No. - 86 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 and perused the record. 2. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer that a direction be issued to learned Civil Judge (J.D.) / F.T.C., Ghaziabad to decide the Complaint Case No. 2214 of 2022 (Rajendra Kumar Sharma vs. Mahendra Pratap), under Section 138 N.I. Act, P.S. Kavi Nagar, District-Ghaziabad, pending in the Court of learned Civil Judge (J.D.) / F.T.C., Ghaziabad within a period of six months. No further prayer has been sought by the petitioner (herein). 3. Having considered the nature of prayer, it is directed that even the first court in the hierarchy of courts, i.e. the court of the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), is also fully competent and authorized to proceed in accordance with the law. 4. It is not only expected but desired that every Court shall conduct the proceedings as prescribed in a particular statute, in order to impart justice to the aggrieved parties. 5. Under the circumstances, no direction is required from this Court that the particular case be disposed of, in a particular period. However, it is expected that the learned Civil Judge (J.D.) shall proceed to dispose of the case in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. Furthermore, even if, the concerned Courts, despite having heavy workload does not take interest in deciding Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Ravindra Kumar Rajendra Kumar Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) the matters or did not follow the directions given by this Court, then consequences would follow. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant revision stands disposed of. March 18, 2026 Faridul A227 No. 11860 of 2025 2 (Harvir Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad