HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10021 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Heard Sri Vikas Maurya, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Learned A.G.A. at the very outset submits that the prayer clause no. (i) made by the petitioner cannot be granted as the investigation is going on. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the prayer clause no. 1. 4. In view of the above, the petitioner is permitted to delete the prayer clause no. 1 during course of the day. 5. Now, learned counsel for the petitioner press this petition with following main prayer:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 3 to conduct fair and proper investigation of case crime no. 0326 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 324(4), 303(2), 333, 118(1), 109(1), 309(4) and 131 of the B.N.S., police station Ram Sanehi Ghat, district Barabanki." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. was lodged on 28.8.2025, but till date, investigation has not been concluded. 4. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of instruction received from Sri Vimlesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vikas Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ram Pal Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Dwivedi, Sub-inspector, police station Ram Sanehi Ghat, district Barabanki, which is taken on record, submits that the the medical examination report was demanded from the petitioner but he has not provided the same, therefore, the investigation could not be completed whereas statements of some witnesses have already been recorded and the spot has been inspected. 5. In view of above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to provide the medication examination report to the concerned Investigating Officer forthwith and in case the same is provided, the investigating officer shall proceed with the investigation and conclude the same expeditiously. In case there is any grievance to the petitioner he will have liberty to approach the concerned court in view of judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of Sakiri Vasu vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others; (2008) 2 SCC 409. October 30, 2025 kanhaiya CRLP No. 10021 of 2025 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench