[2025:RJ-JP:28317] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6463/2025 Hamid Kathat S/o Shri Mohan Kathat, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Sarkana Andheri Devri, Police Station Beawar, Sadar, Tehsil Masooda, District Beawar. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Ajmer, Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya-Ur-Rehman For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/07/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.220/2024 registered at Police Station Ramganj, District Ajmer for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 343, 364, 386 and 120-B of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that the other co-accused persons have been granted bail by the learned trial Court as complainant of this case has entered into compromise. It is contended that trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since 02.01.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:28317] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6463/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that except one case, there are no criminal case against the petitioner and in that case he is on bail. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially the fact that the complainant has entered into compromise with the other co-accused persons and they have been granted bail, period of custody, filing of charge-sheet and trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner–Hamid Kathat S/o Shri Mohan Kathat shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in second week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. [2025:RJ-JP:28317] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6463/2025] 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. The observation made herein above is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J pcg/134