Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010198902025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case : Bail Appln./2766/2025 GAUTAM SHIBU LEENA S/O SHIBU GURUDAS RESIDENT OF SANTHIGIRI A/32 NILA NAGAR P.S. KAZHAKUTTOM DIST. TRIVANDRUM KERALA (ENROLLMENT NO. AM.SC.U3CSC21502 STUDENT OF BCA AMRITA SCHOOL OF COMPUTING AMRITA VISHWA VIDYAPEETHAM UNIVERSITY) VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE LD. PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. M NATH Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 16.09.2025 1. Heard Mr. M. Nath, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. Page No.# 2/2 2. This petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioner, namely, Gautam Shibu Leena, praying for grant of bail in connection with Dispur P.S. Case No.619/2025 under Sections 319(2)/318(4)/316(2)/61(2) of BNS,2023. 3. Case diary as called for is received. 4. The gist of allegation is about suspected involvement of the named accused persons in fraudulent cyber crime of looting innocent persons of their money. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated primarily on suspicion and already completed 55 days in detention. 6. Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that investigation is still continuing in various aspect of the matter. It is further submitted that multiple account details and Q R code are found in the seized mobile phone of the petitioner and the IO has strongly opposed granting of bail to the petitioner projecting his contention that it might be detrimental in investigation. 7. I have also perused the case diary wherein the IO has prepared a detail note and stated that as per investigation one P.R. Ali and Faruq are stated to be the master mind and the present petitioner was in Guwahati for the purpose of such crime on behalf of the alleged master minds. 8. Though 55 days passed however, IO should be given a chance to complete the investigation. 9. Accordingly, the bail application stands rejected and disposed of. 10. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant