SATNAAM SONI @ SATYANAAM SONI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NA528/1555/2025 · 2025-11-03
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182662 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182662 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1555 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed by the applicant for the following main relief(s):-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the chargesheet dated 28.1.2025 filed by the Investigating Officer in FIR/Case Crime No. 50/2025, against petitioner, under Section 420, 406 I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District- Sultanpur and summoning order dated 24.4.2025, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sultanpur in Criminal Case No.2177/2025 (State vs. Satyanaam Soni) arising out of FIR/Case Crime No. 50/2025, under Section 420, 406 I.P.C., Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District- Sultanpur, contained in Annexure No.1 and 2 to this petition. This Hon'ble Court further be pleased to quash the entire criminal proceeding of Criminal Case No.2177/2025 (State vs. Satyanaam Soni) arising out of FIR/Case Crime No. 50/2025, under Section 420, 406 I.P.C., Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District- Sultanpur which is pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sultanpur."
3. Considering the facts of the case as also the punishment provided for the offence under Sections 420, 406 IPC as also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the judgment passed in the case(s) of Satender Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Umesh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Satnaam Soni @ Satyanaam Soni .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. v. State of U.P., (2024) 10 SCC 690, without observing anything on merits, the present application is disposed of with liberty to the applicant to prefer an application in terms of judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (Supra), which shall be decided most expeditiously, and also thereafter to prefer an application seeking discharge based upon the judgment passed in the case of Delhi Race Club (Supra) and other law, which shall be considered and decided by the concerned court by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if possible and if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of. November 3, 2025 Arun/- NA528 No. 1555 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench