1 2025:CGHC:37639 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2244 of 2025 1 - Balveer Baghel W/o Shailendra Kumar Baghel Aged About 37 Years R/o Mig 2a 4/24 Ward No. 12 Jawahar Nagar, Supela Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Collector Durg District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (R) Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Sub Registrar Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate For Respondent/State : Ms. Upasna Mehta, Dy. GA (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.08.01 15:07:05 +0530 2 31/07/2025 By the present writ petition, the petitioner who is the owner of land bearing Survey No.22/4, 29/4 area admeasuring 0.1623, and 0.4001 hectares situated at Kurud, PHN No. 00045, Kohka, Tahsil Durg, District Durg, seeking a direction towards the respondent authorities to permit the petitioner to sale the land owned by the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not making any illegal plotting on the land, however, the petitioner wish to sale the land owned by him within the permissible limit. 3. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions, would submit that if the petitioner wish to sell the land within permissible limit, then the State has no objection to the contention of the petitioner and he may sell the land owned by him within permissible limit of land transactions without any plotting. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 5. Perusal of the pleadings and documents, it is evident that the order of restriction of sale has been imposed by the authorities only to prevent illegal plotting. Since, the petitioner is stating that the petitioner wish to sell the total land owned by him within permissible limit of land transactions, there is nothing left to adjudicate, at this stage and it is directed that the petitioner be permitted to sell his land without making 3 any illegal plotting within permissible limit of land transactions. The petitioner is directed to intimate the concerned authorities at the time of sale of land. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge