Yaddanapudi Naga Srinivasa Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/13388/2025 · 2025-06-15
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18262 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18262 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
> IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) APHC010252392025 SMS MONDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13388 OF 2025 Between: Yaddanapudi Naga Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Narasimha Chary @ Rajeswara Rao aged about 36 years, cultivation. Resident of Gangireddypalem Village Bellamkonda Mandal, palnadu District. ...PETITIONER AND
1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by the Principal Secretary, Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, District. 2. The Superindentendent of Police, Lingamguntia, Narasaraopet, Palnadu District. 3. The Station House officer, Rajupalem Police Station, Rajupalem Mandal, Palnadu District. 4. Pathakamuri Srilakshmi, W/o. Sambasiva Rao, aged about 38 years, Kodavatikallu Village, Chandriapadu Mandal, N.T.R District. 5. Velagaleti Kanthamma, W/o Madhu, aged about 30 years. House wife. Resident of Ajithsingh Nagar, Thamina Durgarao Nagar, Vijayawada City and Mandal, N.T.R District
6. Sunkara Krishna, S/o. Namcharaiah, aged about 32 years. Resident of Door No. 23-34-19, Manepatlivari Street, Bharatiya Vigrianamandir Road, Lakshmi Nagar, Vijayawada city and Mandal, N.T.R District. Home Guntur
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3^^ respondent not considering the representation of the Petitioner dated 02.05.2025 is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also direct the 1®‘ to 3”^^ respondents to resist the illegal activities of the 4'^ to 6*^ respondents with coercive steps by illegal means, unlawful attitudes with evil elements to dispossess the petitioner from the schedule property and also may direct the respondents to fallow the due process of law in respect of the suit dismissed instead of decreed by the Hon’ble PrI. Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Sattenapalli in O.S No. 150/2015 in the interest of equity and justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to Consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 02.05.2025 to the 3^^ respondent in the interest of equity and justice and Pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SESHAGIRI RAO ULLAM Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6:-- The Court made the following: ORDER
1 HN, J W.P.No.l3388_2025 APHC010252392025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13388/2025 Between: Yaddanapudi Naga Srinivasa Rao ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SESHAGIRI RAOULLAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME ...RESPONDENT(S)
2 HNJjr W.P.No.13388 2025 The Court made the following Order:
1. Heard. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondentNo.3 is not acting on the petitioner’s representation dated 02.05.2025. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home Department submits that the petitioner’s representation dated 02.05.2025 will be considered by the respondents, as per the law. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to disposed off the Writ Petition at the stage of admission itself, directing the respondent No.3 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated in accordance with law and as per the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, (for short, "BNSS”). 02.05.2025 As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- A.VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// r SECTION OFFICER
1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi
2. The Superintendent of Police, Lingamguntia, Narasaraopet, District. 3. The Station House officer, Rajupalem Police Station, Mandal, Palnadu District. 4. One CC to Sri Seshagiri Rao Ullam, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CC’s to GP for Home, High Court of A.P. at AmaravatifOUT]
6. Three CD Copies. To, Guntur District. Palnadu Rajupalem I-
HIGH COURT DATED: 16/06/2025 ORDER WP No.13388 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS