HUSSAIN ALI @ HOSSEN ALI v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS
WP(C)/4980/2025 · 2025-09-18
Kalyan Rai Surana, Rajesh Mazumdar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18261 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18261 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010191222025
2025:GAU-AS:12989-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4980/2025 HUSSAIN ALI @ HOSSEN ALI S/O LATE LALMAMUD SHEIKH @ NALU SHEIKH @ LAL @ NALU, R/O VILL- KHARBALLI, P.S.- KALGACHIA, DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVT. OF INDIA, SHASTRI BAHWAN, TILOK MARG, NEW DELHI- 1 2:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NEW DELHI-110001 3:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM HOME DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP (M) HENGRABARI GUWAHATI-781036 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BARPETA P.O. AND DIST- BARPETA ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3 PIN-781301 6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER) KAMRUP (M) PAN BAZAAR GUWAHATI-781001 ASSAM 7:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER) BARPETA P.O. AND DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781301 8:THE STATE CO-ORDINATOR OF NRC ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX 2ND FLOOR BANPHOOL NAGAR DISPUR GUWAHATI-78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N AHMED, IMDADUL ISLAM,M RAHMAN,MR A BASUMATARY,MR. M M ZAMAN Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, F.T,SC, NRC,SC, ECI,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 19.09.2025 (Kalyan Rai Surana, J.) Heard Mr. N. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. G. Pegu, learned CGC; Mr. G. Sharma, learned Standing Counsel for the FT matters and NRC; Mr. M. Kalita, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. P. Barua, learned Standing Counsel for the ECI; and Mr. P. Sarmah, learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate for the State respondent.
Page No.# 3/3
2. As the amended Cause Title of the respondents has not been filed by the petitioner, despite the orders dated 03.09.2025 and 15.09.2025, this Court is inclined to close this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court again, by filing a fresh writ petition.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant