MANNA @ ABDUL HASEEB v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
A482/9128/2025 · 2025-10-29
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182604 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182604 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9128 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Power filed by Shri Avanish Kumar Azad, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record. 3. The present application has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire criminal proceedings of S.T. No.679 of 2015 and also charge sheet filed under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC., and Section 3 (1) (10) SC/ST Act, in Case Crime No.99 of 2010, P.S. Gudamba, District Lucknow. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and a compromise has been arrived between them dated 06.10.2025 (Original copy of the same is appended as Annexure No.5 to the application). 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below, before which, the case is pending. Therefore, the compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court below itself. 6. Counsel for opposite party no. 2 has no objection, in case compromise takes place. 7. Both the parties are directed to appear before the concerned court on Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jag Prasad Yadav, Mohd. Shahid Rais Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Avanish Kumar Azad Manna @ Abdul Haseeb .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
04.11.2025 and pursue their compromise application. The concerned court is directed to pass an order on the said compromise application and all formalities will be completed within four months. 8. Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it or has been already filed, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record.
The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 9. For a period of four months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 10. Registry is directed to return the original copy of the compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants after taking photocopy of the same. October 29, 2025 Pks A482 No. 9128 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench