Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1826 (AP)

M VENU GOPAL REDDY v. SRI PEYUSH KUMAR

CC/3002/2025 · 2026-05-05

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010545812025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3002/2025 Between: 1. M VENU GOPAL REDDY, S/O. M.VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, RESIDENT OF D.NO.1/151, KOPPOLU, VALLUR, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI PEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI N MANOJ REDDY, COMMISSIONER, KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KADAPA. Y.S.R DISTRICT. 3. SRI A VIJAY KUMAR REDDY, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KADAPA MUNICIPAL COIPORATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents herein for violation of the orders, dated 01.08.2025 made in W.P.No.20119 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 2. M DELHI BABU The Court made the following: Order:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.20119 of 2025, dated 01.08.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 06.05.2026 PNS