DEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/10869/2025 · 2025-11-15
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182593 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182593 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10869 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.0078 of 2025 under sections 137(2), Police Station Shivgarh, District Sultanpur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the FIR in question was lodged alleging that the daughter of the informant, aged about 15 years, was enticed away by the applicant, subsequently, in her two statements, the victim did not support the prosecution and stated that she was in love with the applicant. It is further submitted that the victim refused to undergo medical examination. There is no definite document with regard to the exact age of the victim.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances including the two statements, which are not supporting prosecution, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 17.07.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Deep Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramakar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Deep Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 15, 2025 Raj BAIL No. 10869 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench