NANDU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME. LKO and OTHERS
/6565/2019 · 2025-12-04
Rajeev Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182588 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182588 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6565 of 2019 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Case called out.
2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is of the year 2019 and relates to Section 135(1)(b) of Electricity Act, which is compoundable.
3. When the matter was called out, none appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this application. Neither any adjournment slip nor any request on behalf of the applicant has been made to adjourn the case.
4. Learned A.G.A. appearing for the State is present.
5. The application appears to have lost its efficacy due to efflux of time, hence dismissed.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. December 4, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramakar Shukla, Ravindra Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Nandu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home. Lko And Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench