ARADHANA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NA529/93/2025 · 2025-12-05
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182582 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182582 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 93 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant has approached this Court for getting a direction issued to the Additional Principal Judge, Court No.4, Family Court, Lucknow to decide Case No.1900 of 2024, Aradhana Yadav Vs. Sumit Yadav, under Section 144 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha sanhita, 2023, within a time frame.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that case is pending since 2024 and there is no substantial progress in it. He, therefore, prays that a direction be issued to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously in accordance with law.
4. In view of the aforesaid facts, the court concerned is directed to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously in accordance with law without giving any unnecessary adjournments.
5. Application stands disposed of. December 5, 2025 Rao/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailendra Misra, Rahil Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Aradhana Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench