CHHAVI NATH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AND 7 OTHERS
/1075/2025 · 2025-11-28
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182576 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182576 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1075 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Counter affidavit filed by learned AGA for the State today in Court is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri R.B.S. Rathaur, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 7 and learned AGA for the State.
3. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and chargesheet has been forwarded against the petitioner on 17.03.2025 and, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid fact.
5. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum at appropriate stage. November 28, 2025 kkv/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalji Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., R.B.S. Rathaur (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Chhavi Nath Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench