Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182573 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD FAROOQ AND 9 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/10410/2025 · 2025-12-11

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10410 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party no.1 and Sri Priyanshu Tiwari, learned counsel, who has filed power on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. The present application has been filed seeking following main relief :- "to quash and set aside the impugned charge sheet dated 27/11/2022 and summoning order dated 08/02/2023 along with other consequential proceedings pending before Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Sultanpur, in Criminal Misc. Case No. 103/2025 "State Vs Farooq & others", in FIR No. 45/2022 U/S 498 A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C & 34 DP Act P.S. Mahila Thana District- Amethi on the basis of compromise Contained in Annexure-1 and 2 to this Petition." 3. Learned counsel for both the parties submit that parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court by way of compromise and the original compromise deed dated 26.11.2025 has been annexed as Annexure-5 to the application, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court, as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties before the court concerned. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satyendra Nath Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohammad Farooq And 9 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of with a direction to both the parties to appear before the court concerned within three weeks and file their comprise application. If such compromise application is filed, the court concerned shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise within six weeks from the date. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court making compromise to be part of the record and a report to that effect shall also be send to this Court whether the said compromise took place or not. The court concerned will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise. It will also be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 6. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid complaint case. 7. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the counsel for the applicant(s) after retaining a photocopy of the same on record. December 11, 2025 Mohit Singh/- A482 No. 10410 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench