ANSHU SAVITA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/11146/2025 · 2025-11-17
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182559 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182559 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11146 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant despite notice.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.0444 of 2025 under Sections 376, 506, 342, 427 IPC and Section 67 of IT Act, P.S.- Gangaghat, District- Unnao.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the applicant had committed wrong on the victim on 18.07.2025 and some video was also shot. Subsequently, a promise for marriage was made. However, for the last three years, physical relations were being formed. The tentative age of the victim is 22 years.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the fact that the physical relations were formed between the parties on different occasions coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 17.09.2025 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant- Anshu Savita be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhir Kumar Rai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anshu Savita .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 17, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 11146 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench