Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182556 (ALL)

H.K. INFRAVISION PRIVATE LIMITED THRU. ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/9901/2025 · 2025-10-30

Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9901 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Vijai Prakash Dwivedi, learned AGA for the State- opposite parties no.1 to 3. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no4 is hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has assailed the impugned FIR bearing FIR/Case Crime No.0370 of 2025, under Sections 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2), 61 (2), 111 (2) (b), 352, 351 (3) of B.N.S. 2023, Police Station- Mohan Lalganj, District- Lucknow South (Commissionerate Lucknow). 4. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 may be given liberty to file anticipatory bail before the competent court and a direction may be issued to decide the same. He has further informed that the Sri Vinai Kumar Upadhyay, who is Managing Director of the petitioner no. 1 and also husband of the petitioner no. 2, has already been arrested and he is in judicial custody. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue and considering Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virendra Kumar Shukla, Divya Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. H.K. Infravision Private Limited Thru. Its Managing Director Vinod Kumar Upadhyay And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) the innocuous aforesaid request of learned counsel for the petitioner, we hereby disposed of this petition at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 to file anticipatory bail applications within a period of three weeks taking all pleas and grounds, which are available to them. If such application is filed, the same may be heard and disposed of on its own merits with expedition without giving any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties. 6 . The writ petition is disposed of finally in view of the aforesaid terms. . October 30, 2025 Anuj Singh CRLP No. 9901 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench