SMT. POONAM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/9911/2025 · 2025-11-12
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182545 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182545 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9911 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.
1. Heard Shri Irfan Alam, learned counsel for petitioners as well as Shri Aniruddh Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent(s) and perused the materials available on record.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to opposite party no.4 is dispensed with.
3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners has prayed for the following relief(s) :-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI thereby quashing the impugned First information report No 0354/2025, U/S 137(2) of B.N.S. 2023 at police Station Sirsiya, District Shravasti;
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opp. Parties not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the impugned First information report No 0354/2025, U/S 137(2) of B.N.S. 2023 at police Station Sirsiya , District Shravasti."
4. Shri Aniruddh Singh, learned A.G.A. has shown the instructions showing the details of the prosecutrix including her statement recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S, the same are taken on record. He has further submitted that the petitioner no.2 has filed a bail application before the competent Court, which is pending consideration.
5. On the aforesaid submissions, learned counsel for the petitioners has requested that he may be permitted to not press this petition at this stage and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Irfan Alam Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Smt. Poonam And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
liberty may be given to take appropriate legal recourse before the appropriate Court of Law.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed being not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.
November 12, 2025 Praveen CRLP No. 9911 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench