Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182544 (ALL)

Chuttan @Rampat @Rafiq v. State of U.P. through Principal Secretary Home and another

/1351/2025 · 2025-12-08

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1351 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State.Notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with, in view of the proposed order. 2.The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.58 of 2017 under sections 3/5Ka/8 Cow Slaughter Act, P.S. Dhaurahra, district Lakhimpur Kheri. 3.Learned counsel for applicant, after arguing for some time, submits that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application; rather he may be granted liberty to file regular bail application and the same may be decided in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021. 4.In view of the above, prayer for anticipatory bail is refused and the application is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the applicant files a regular bail application within two weeks from today, the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). December 8, 2025/kkb/ Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashok Kumar, Chandra Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Chuttan @Rampat @Rafiq .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Through Principal Secretary Home And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench