MADAN NAG v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/10900/2024 · 2025-12-08
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182523 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182523 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10900 of 2024 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that co-accused Dipu Rawat, who is alleged to have impersonated the complainant and executed the sale deed in favour of the purchaser, has already been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 02.05.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10066 of 2024. It is argued that the applicant stands on an even better footing, as he is merely a marginal witness in the alleged transaction. The applicant has been in custody since 09.10.2022. It is further submitted that subsequent to the present incident, several more cases, over ten in number, have been registered against the applicant stemming from the same matter. His criminal antecedents have been duly disclosed in paragraph 11 of the bail application. The offences alleged are triable by the Magistrate. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away after being released from jail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. Considering that the offences are triable by the Magistrate, co-accused Dipu Rawat has already been enlarged on bail, the applicant has been incarcerated Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Upendra Prakash Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Madan Nag .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
since 09.10.2022, and his criminal antecedents have been explained in paragraph 11 of the bail application, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Madan Nag, involved in Case Crime No. - 931/2022, Under Section -419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., Police Station - Kotwali Nagar, District - Barabanki, be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. December 8, 2025 R.C.
BAIL No. 10900 of 2024 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench