APHC010252802017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESFT AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE^ AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI lA No.2 OF 2017 IN/AND WRIT APPEAL NO: 595 OF 2017^ lA No.2 OF 2017 (WAMP No.1198 OF 2017) Between: Sri Varaha Lakshmi Narasimha Swatny Vari Devastanam, Rep. by its Executive Officer, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam District. ...Appellant AND 1. Smt. Peethala Papayamma, W/o. Late Appa Rao, aged about 68 years, R/o.D.No.27-130, Appanna Palem, Vepagunta, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Endowments Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi, Velagapudi, Guntur District. ...Respondents Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 424 days in filing of present Writ Appeal in the interest of justice. WRIT APPEAL NO: 595 OF 2017 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal preferred agaihst the Order dated 25.01.2016 in WP No. 36918 of 2015 on the file of the High Court. lA NO: 3 OF 2017fWAMP 1199 OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant Interim suspension of the order made in W.P.M.P. No. 47548/2015 in W.P. No. 36918/2015, dated 13.11.2015, which has been made absolute vide order made in W.V.M.P. No. 70/2016, dated 25.01.2016, pending disposal of present Writ Appeal in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. V. SHIVAJI ^ Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI AKULA VAMSI KRISHNA representing SRI P. ROY REDDY ^ Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR ENDOWMENT?^ The Court made the following: JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Bench Sr.No:-6 [3483] APHC010252802017 AT AMARAVATI I.A.No.2 of 2017 in/and Writ Appeal No.595 of 2017 Sri Varaha Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Vari Devastanam, Visakhapatnam ...Appellant Vs. Smt Peethala Papayamma and another ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Appellant Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): Mr. G V Shivaji Mr. Akula Vamsi Krishna representing Mr. P Roy Reddy for R.1 GP For Endowments for R.2 CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI : 1®* July, 2025 DATE PC : Learned Government Pleader for the Endowments Department states that during the pendency of the present appeal, the main writ petition has since been disposed of by virtue of the judgment and order, dated 18.02.2025. In that view of the matter, the writ appeal becomes infructuous. sr 2 HCJ & RC, J WA 595_2017 Accordingly, l.A.No.2 of 2017 along with the Writ Appeal is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGia! RAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Sri G. V. Shivaji, Advocate [OPUC] ^ 2. One CC to Sri P. Roy Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] GP for Endowments, High Court of A.P. at Amaravati[OUTJ 3. Two CC’s to 4. Three CD Copies ssb HIGH COURT DATED;01/07/2025 JUDGMENT lA No.2 of 2017 in/and WA No.595of2017 ANSfi^ 14 JUL 2025 ar fTl <o Current Section . DISPOSING OF THE lA No.2 of 2017 & WRIT APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS