Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182518 (ALL)

ROSHAN LAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER

BAIL/1934/2025 · 2025-11-11

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1934 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 146 of 2022 under sections 498A, 302 IPC, Sections 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Kotwali Tanda, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the first bail application of the applicant was rejected on 26.2.2024. While arguing the second bail application learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant was married to the applicant. Subsequently the entire matrimonial family used to harass her for demand of dowry. It was stated that the applicant had killed her. The applicant is the husband. The trial court record indicate that all the witness have been examined and the informant and the family members of the deceased have been turned hostile. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 1.6.2022 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajeet Kumar, Savita Nandan, Shravan Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Roshan Lal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Let the applicant Roshan Lal be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 11, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 1934 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench