SANJAY KUMAR @ SANJAY KUMAR CHATURVEDI v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, ADMINISTRATIVE, 2ND, DIVISION DEVI PATAN, GONDA AND ANOTHER
/6773/2025 · 2025-11-19
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6773 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondent is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 -Additional Commissioner (Administration-II), Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda to decide Revision No.01338/2019, computerized case No.C201908000001338 titled as Sanjay Kumar Vs. Parvati Devi under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Administration-II), Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda is directed to decide Revision No.01338/2019, computerized case No.C201908000001338 titled as Sanjay Kumar Vs. Parvati Devi under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 19, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Kumar Shukla, Shivam Srivastava, Shivani Maskara Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Kumar Chaturvedi .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner, Administrative, 2nd, Division Devi Patan, Gonda And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench