Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182505 (ALL)

RAJENDRA KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DIST. MAGISTRATE DIST. BARABANKI AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/4327/2025 · 2025-10-31

Shekhar B Saraf, Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 4327 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. We have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. We have perused the impugned order dated 29.01.2025 wherein the Medical Board has appointed the respondent No.4 to be the nominated representative of the respondent No.5 in terms of Section 14 (4) (D) of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017. 3. Upon perusal of the said order, we are of the view that the Medical Board has examined various factors and come to the said conclusion. At this stage, we do not see any reason to interfere with the said order. In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed off with liberty granted to the petitioner to move an appropriate application, if so advised, before the Medical Board for revocation of the appointment of the nominated representative, in accordance with law. 4. In case such an application is made by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date, the Medical Board shall grant an opportunity of hearing the parties and thereafter, pass a reasoned order in accordance with law within a period eight weeks from the date of filing of the said application. October 31, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pashupati Nath Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Rajendra Kumar Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Dist. Magistrate Dist. Barabanki And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench