Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18250 (BOM)

MANAGER CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. DEVENDRA PARSHURAM BHAND AND ANOTHER

CA/5427/2024 · 2025-01-15

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} 20 sr.no..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 20 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5427 OF 2024 IN FAST/14527/2024 MANAGER, CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. VERSUS DEVENDRA PARSHURAM BHAND VERSUS VISHAL SUDAM KUMBHAR AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Aniruddha S Usmanpurkar Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Shaikh Sohail Yusuf CORAM : S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATE : 15TH JANUARY, 2025. O R D E R :- IN C.A. NO. 5427 OF 2024 The applicant – Insurance Company seeks to condone the delay of 357 days caused in filing the appeal. From the contents of the application it appears that delay is caused on account of administrative reasons. The applicant is a body corporate and require to follow in- house procedure for filing the appeal. Under such circumstances, delay cannot be said to be intentional and deliberate. The applicant cannot be said to have derived any disadvantage by making delaly. 2. Considering submissions advanced and reasons stated in the application the delay is sufficiently explained. Hence, application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Appeal be registered. {2} 20 sr.no..odt C.A. NO.5428 OF 2024 FOR STAY Mr. Osmanpurkar, learned advocate for applicant submits that entire amount as per the award has been deposited with the Registry of this Court. Statement is not controverted by learned advocate for claimants. Hence, application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and disposed of. [S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J] grt/-