Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182492 (ALL)

RAVI KUMAR PANDEY AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/1751/2025 · 2025-11-19

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1751 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard. 2. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the the charge-sheet No. 16/2025 under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) Β. N.S., Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station- Mahila Thana, District- Amethi and summoning order dated 01.09.2025 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) / F.T.C. Crime Against Women, Sultanpur, as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 14775/2025, 'State Vs Ravi Kumar Pandey & others', arising out of Case Crime No. 0006/2025, under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) Β.N.S., Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at Police Station - Mahila Thana, District - Amethi, in the light of compromise taken place between the parties dated 11.08.2025." 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.4 to the application. 4. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 5. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prithvish Mishra, Shanker Lal Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravi Kumar Pandey And 6 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 6. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 7. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 8. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. November 19, 2025 Arpan NA528 No. 1751 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench