Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18249 (PAT)

Utsav Bharat v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./10708/2025 · 2025-04-08

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10708 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-193 Year-2024 Thana- SHAHPUR PATORI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Utsav Bharat S/o- Dilip Kumar Ray @ Sharvan Rai @ Dilip Kumar Village- Harpur Saidabad Ps- Patori Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shankar Prasad Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajit Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 08-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, while the informant and his associates were returning after playing DJ sound, four unknown accused persons overpowered their vehicle and on gun point, they snatched DJ vehicle, mobile phone, documents and cash Rs.10,000/-. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner his name has come in this case during course of investigation on the basis of his confessional statement made in Patori Police Station Case No. 204/2024. Petitioner is ITI student pursing his course in Chaurasia Rajkishore Industrial Training Center, Hajipur. 5. Learned counsel for the State opposes prayer for bail. He submits that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent of Arms Act which indicates that he is habitual criminal, as Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10708 of 2025(2) dt.08-04-2025 2/2 such, he cannot be given privilege of pre-arrest bail. 6. Considering the nature and gravity of allegation and criminal antecedent of the petitioner, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. Shashi (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T