Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182478 (ALL)

RAGHU NATH YADAV v. SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER ZILA PANCHAYAT MONITORING CELL, LKO. AND ANOTHER

CAPL/3121/2025 · 2025-10-31

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3121 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. Learned counsel for applicant has submitted that he does not want to press the present contempt application as after filing of the present contempt application, the notice has been served upon him providing him an opportunity of hearing as directed by the Writ Court. Hence, present contempt application may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage. 2. Accordingly, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous with the liberty as prayed above. October 31, 2025 Arti/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kshemendra Shukla, Vindhya Washini Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Manish Kumar,J.) Raghu Nath Yadav .....Applicant(s) Sri Praveen Kumar, Superintending Engineer Zila Panchayat Monitoring Cell, Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench