Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182476 (ALL)

HEMRAJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

/943/2025 · 2025-11-27

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 943 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.181 of 2024, under Section 302, 201, 34 IPC, P.S. Sidhauli, District Sitapur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co-accused with same allegation was enlarged on bail vide order dated 19.11.2025. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering and adopting the same reasoning, the applicant who has explained his criminal antecedent is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Hemraj be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anurag Singh, Lalji Prasad Shukla, Rama Niwas Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Hemraj .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 27, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 943 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench