Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:28641
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 494 of 2018 Yogendra Kumar Sahu S/o Shravan Kumar Sahu Aged About 29 Years Behind Shivam Sales, Chantideeh, City, Tahsil, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
--- Applicant versus
1. Smt. Priyanka Sahu W/o Yogendra Kumar Sahu Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Bahtarai, Thana Sarkanda, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
2. Minor Nikhil Sahu S/o Yogendra Kumar Sahu Aged About 3 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian And Mother Non Applicant No. 1, R/o Village Bahtarai, Thana Sarkanda, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s)
For Applicant : Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondents : Ms. Pranoti Das, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Gautam Khetrapal, Advocate. CRR No. 669 of 2018
1. Smt. Priyanka Sahu W/o Yogendra Sahu Aged About 24 Years R/o- Village- Bahtarai, Police Station- Sarkanda, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
2
2. Nikhil Sahu S/o Yogendra Sahu Aged About 3 Years R/o- Village- Bahtarai, Police Station- Sarkanda, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
---Applicant Versus Yogendra Sahu @ Raja S/o Shrawan Sahu Aged About 28 Years R/o- Behind Shivam Sales, Chantidih, Police Station- Sarkanda, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent
For Applicants : Ms. Pranoti Das, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Gautam Khetrapal, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Order on Board 27.06.2025
1. In CRR No.494/2018, the present revision has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer:-
“It is therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to allow this revision and may further be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 09.08.2017 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) in M.J.C. No.- 153/2017 whereby the Learned Court has passed an order directing the applicant to pay the maintenance of Rs.15,000/- per month, in the interest and also in the ends of justice.”
2. In CRR No. 669/2018, the present revision has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer:-
“It is therefore prayed that, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this revision and enhance the maintenance already awarded by the learned Family Court by order dated 09.08.2017, in the interest of justice.”
3.
Learned counsel for the revisionist/applicant submits that the matter has PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2025.06.28 17:35:19 +0530
3 been compromised between the husband and wife.
4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the revisionist, the present revision is dismissed as infructuous.
5. Let a copy of this order as well as original record of this case be transmitted to the trial Court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance. Sd/-
(Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice
Preeti