GHANSHYAM YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/10098/2025 · 2025-10-30
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182439 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182439 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10098 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the writ petitioner has sought for the following substantial reliefs :-
"I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite Parties particularly Opposite Party No.2 to release the compensation amount with in stipulated period in favour of the petitioner which is already reserve by the authority under the scheme of the State Government i.e. Mukhya Mantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana, in the interest of justice. II) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite Parties particularly Opposite Party No.2 to decide the representation dated 17.12.2024 of the petitioner (Contained as Annexure No. 8) in term of the recommendation by the SDM dated 27.12.2023 within stipulated period, in the interest of justice"
3. Upon perusal of the petition, we are of the view that the order of rejection passed by the District Magistrate has not taken into account the factual issues and the rejection is, accordingly, bad in law.
4. In light of the same, we remand the matter to the District Magistrate and direct him to look into the issue once again and grant Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar, Dinesh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ghanshyam Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Once the same is done, a reasoned order should be passed and if the petitioner is found eligible for compensation, the said compensation should be paid within a period of two weeks from passing of the said order. The reasoned order should be passed within a period of eight weeks from date.
5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 30, 2025 cks/- WRIC No. 10098 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench