FAKHARUDDIN @ AJMAL @ AJMAL HUSAIN v. STATE OF U.P THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECRT. LKO.
/7086/2024 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182438 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182438 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7086 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.25 of 2024, under Sections 498A, 304B IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Shivgarh, District Sultanpur. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was married to the applicant. Subsequently, on account of non-payment of dowry, she was killed by the entire matrimonial family. The cause of death, as per the postmortem report, was ante mortem throttling. 4. The Counsel for the applicant argues that two of the witnesses have already been examined. The applicant is the husband and has no criminal antecedents. The applicant is in custody since 07.03.2024. 5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 6. Considering the fact that only two witnesses have been examined and the applicant is suffering pretrial detention of more than one and half years and the applicant has no criminal antecedents, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anjani Kumar Dvivedi, Archana Devi, Santosh Kumar Srivastava, Sukrit Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Anand Kumar Srivastava Fakharuddin @ Ajmal @ Ajmal Husain .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Let the applicant Fakharuddin @ Ajmal @ Ajmal Husain be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 20, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 7086 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench