MOHAMMAD SAGIR ALIAS SAGIR AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9520/2025 · 2025-11-14
Abdul Shahid
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182434 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182434 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9520 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Dildar Khan, learned counsel who has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party no. 2 and the learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (now Section 528 B.N.S.) has been filed with a prayer to quash the summoning order dated 10.4.2023 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Room No. 27, Lucknow as well as entire proceeding of case crime no. 16 of 2022, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Chinhat, District Lucknow as well as entire proceedings of the aforesaid. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners had already approached this Court by way of Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No. 6635 of 2025 (Mohammad Sagir @ Sagir and 5 others Vs. State of U.P.), which was disposed of with the direction to the trial Court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record, vide order dated
14.8.2025. 4. In compliance of the aforesaid order dated 14.8.2025 mentioned hereinabove, the parties had entered into a compromise and in this regard, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Syed Tamjeed Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohammad Sagir Alias Sagir And 5 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
report of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V, Room No.29, Lucknow, in Case No. 33418 of 2023, case crime no. 16 of 2022, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Chinhat, District Lucknow dated 28.8.2025 is annexed as Annexure-5 to the petition. 5. Learned counsels for both the parties have jointly submitted that as the parties have entered into compromise and no dispute between them is left, the petition may be allowed and the proceeding pending before the learned trial court may be quashed. 6.
In view thereof, the summoning order dated 10.4.2023 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Room No. 27, Lucknow as well as entire proceeding of case crime no. 16 of 2022, under Sections 498- A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Chinhat, District Lucknow, so far as it relates to the petitioners, namely, Mohammad Sagir Alias Sagir, Safikun Nisha Alias Soniya, Rukaiya, Sabiha, Shabbir Alias Mohammad Shabbir and Jameela Baano Alias Jameela, is hereby quashed. 7. The petition is allowed, accordingly. November 14, 2025 M. Tarik A482 No. 9520 of 2025 2 (Abdul Shahid,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD TARIK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench