ARUN KUMAR PANDEY v. U.P. POORVANCHAL VIKAS NIGAM LTD. THRU. COMMISSIONER AND ORS
WRIA/14107/2018 · 2025-12-17
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182424 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182424 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14107 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 17, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Chandra Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Arun Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Poorvanchal Vikas Nigam Ltd. Thru. Commissioner And Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench