CHAND MOHMMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/10284/2025 · 2025-11-06
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182401 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182401 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10284 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri L.J. Maurya, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of informant. The Vakalatnama is taken on record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.183 of 2025, under Sections 123, 318(4), 143, 351(2), 70(1) of BNS, Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow. 3. In terms of the FIR lodged through an application under Section 173(3) of BNS, it was alleged that the applicant was running a rocket in the garb of beauty parlor and it was revealed that some inappropriate videos of the informant was also made. Subsequently, she was forced to marry somewhere else and on 09.02.2023, she was called and administered something in a tea by the applicant and when she became conscious, she was got married to an old man in a temple. It was subsequently stated that the said person was purchased her for a sum of rupees three lacks. Threats were also issued. The tentative age of the victim is around 20 years. The criminal antecedents of the applicant has been disclosed in para 21 of the bail application. 4. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned Counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the nature of the allegations and the age of the victim and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atul Verma, Akhilendra Pratap Singh, Vinod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Chand Mohmmad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 03.07.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6.
Let the applicant Chand Mohmmad be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 6, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 10284 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench